Montagut contractors raise further appeal over trademark dispute
January 4, 2008The Chinese agent and manufacturer of French fashion brand Montagut have appealed to a higher court in Shanghai against an earlier court ruling of paying 100,000 yuan （13,500 U.S. dollars） in compensation to a Chinese firm for trademark infringement.
Guangzhou Funa Clothing Co., Ltd. -- Montagut’s general agent of underwear in China, and Shanghai Guangnuo Garment Co., Ltd. -- the manufacturer, appealed to the Shanghai High People’s Court on December 10, claiming that the first-instance sentence handed down by Shanghai No. 2 Intermediate People’s Court was improper.
The initial verdict said the two defendants, which named a kind of man’s wool underwear with “AB”, had infringed the trademark right of the plaintiff Jiangsu AB Group Co., Ltd. and thus should compensate the due economic loss.
However, the two companies said the first-instance ruling overprotected the ordinary letter composition of A and B.
They claimed that the disputed underwear contains a mixture of two kinds of yarn that are habitually called as AB yarn, so the lawsuit filed by the plaintiff was of obvious vicious purpose.
According to Wang Junbao, Deputy Director of Standardization Institute of Textile Industry, no industry standards have been established to name compound materials in China.
The case may help to promote relevant government authorities to stipulate industrial criterion on traditional materials, said Wang.
Guangzhou Funa Clothing Co., Ltd. -- Montagut’s general agent of underwear in China, and Shanghai Guangnuo Garment Co., Ltd. -- the manufacturer, appealed to the Shanghai High People’s Court on December 10, claiming that the first-instance sentence handed down by Shanghai No. 2 Intermediate People’s Court was improper.
The initial verdict said the two defendants, which named a kind of man’s wool underwear with “AB”, had infringed the trademark right of the plaintiff Jiangsu AB Group Co., Ltd. and thus should compensate the due economic loss.
However, the two companies said the first-instance ruling overprotected the ordinary letter composition of A and B.
They claimed that the disputed underwear contains a mixture of two kinds of yarn that are habitually called as AB yarn, so the lawsuit filed by the plaintiff was of obvious vicious purpose.
According to Wang Junbao, Deputy Director of Standardization Institute of Textile Industry, no industry standards have been established to name compound materials in China.
The case may help to promote relevant government authorities to stipulate industrial criterion on traditional materials, said Wang.
Keywords
Headquarters
Add(Beijing):7th Floor,Scitech Place,22 Jianguomenwai Avenue,Beijing 100004,China
Tel: ＋86 10 5920 8888
Fax: ＋86 10 5920 8588
E-mail: [email protected]
Newsletter
Do not miss out on the latest announcements we've provided
Networking
Unitalen Mail Box ?2016 Unitalen Attorneys at Law 版權所有 集佳知識產權代理有限公司 京ICP備11033076號 京公網安備11010502020670